The answer, if you know the operation of a local authority, is "yes." And yes as a matter of lack of control of those who have to perform this oversight role. And yes as a matter of lack of ethics and real respect for the fundamental principles of our legal system.
In this case, we issue legal report on the recruitment of temporary agency staff.
REPORT --- ---
Any recruitment of staff from Local Government is based on the mandatory application of the principles of equality, merit and ability as enshrined in the Constitution to any proceedings of income or access to function public.
When that access takes place for the provision of a place or performing some functions of a temporary nature, the arrangement does not provide what has to be the specific mechanisms by which it articulates. However, it foresees the need, in addition to the guarantees provided for applicants, the instrument or means seized of the case is designed to answer the demand for staff with the agility required coverage.
is a widespread practice of making lists job boards or recruitment, after a public announcement and, often, taking as its starting point the results of a previous selection process for access to the status of official / a career or of fixed labor / a by the administration.
is exemplary cases in which it is to what bases have call provisions of the City Council in public squares above to determine how to incorporate these places temporary and urgent, in most cases.
is normal in these cases, giving preference to access to the square who credited work experience in government or in the position applied.
When selecting personal reasons are unrelated to an objective procedure and standards. We consider that there is no qualification necessary that there has been an objective selection. With the legal responsibilities that derimen, in particular, responsibilities to those left out of the selection and hurt by the lack of objectivity of the process.
Therefore, these administrative proceedings is considered as a recruitment "irregular" in contravention of the necessary independence of the process and disregards the principles equality, merit and ability, according to which are set in most administrations temporal hedging mechanisms.
This erratic behavior by the administration means an injury to third persons, preference in selection for objective reasons to the courts to analyze, and that they damage the better right of access to the public, depriving him of his right to work, to receive the salary, to accumulate experience and other concepts that are inherent. And that may be claimed at the appropriate legal channels.
In this case, we issue legal report on the recruitment of temporary agency staff.
REPORT --- ---
Any recruitment of staff from Local Government is based on the mandatory application of the principles of equality, merit and ability as enshrined in the Constitution to any proceedings of income or access to function public.
When that access takes place for the provision of a place or performing some functions of a temporary nature, the arrangement does not provide what has to be the specific mechanisms by which it articulates. However, it foresees the need, in addition to the guarantees provided for applicants, the instrument or means seized of the case is designed to answer the demand for staff with the agility required coverage.
is a widespread practice of making lists job boards or recruitment, after a public announcement and, often, taking as its starting point the results of a previous selection process for access to the status of official / a career or of fixed labor / a by the administration.
is exemplary cases in which it is to what bases have call provisions of the City Council in public squares above to determine how to incorporate these places temporary and urgent, in most cases.
is normal in these cases, giving preference to access to the square who credited work experience in government or in the position applied.
When selecting personal reasons are unrelated to an objective procedure and standards. We consider that there is no qualification necessary that there has been an objective selection. With the legal responsibilities that derimen, in particular, responsibilities to those left out of the selection and hurt by the lack of objectivity of the process.
Therefore, these administrative proceedings is considered as a recruitment "irregular" in contravention of the necessary independence of the process and disregards the principles equality, merit and ability, according to which are set in most administrations temporal hedging mechanisms.
This erratic behavior by the administration means an injury to third persons, preference in selection for objective reasons to the courts to analyze, and that they damage the better right of access to the public, depriving him of his right to work, to receive the salary, to accumulate experience and other concepts that are inherent. And that may be claimed at the appropriate legal channels.
0 comments:
Post a Comment