I leave a link to the post published in Public Law Blog Sevach which analyzes one of the most pernicious practices that exist in the Administration, and that is, hiring external legal consultants.
Why? Such reports
meet any outside legal the following goals: Strengthen
- political criteria. If an author would legalize cocaine, never missing a consultant who handled the Human Rights Convention, the resolutions of the WHO, the constitutional right to privacy or the Twelve Tables, well seasoned with dog-Latin, get no longer sustain their legality but the obligation of consumption and supply. This in an elaborate report, with stamps and colorful, and signed by some unscrupulous scholar. Sort
- inconvenient technical reports. If one wants to circumvent the competition authority to award a contract or the selective tests to recruit a buddy, or reclassify urbanistically land, and the only stumbling block is a report of the Chief corresponding simply seek an opinion from an external consultancy to get the abracadabra that it was impossible to feasible and desirable.
- prebendal Trading in influence and to politicians on the bench (in a sporting sense) and should be in another bench (in the criminal sense).
0 comments:
Post a Comment