really
Mr. Zapatero did not answer the question. D. Juan Carlos Gómez-Rico Martín-Gil, a diocesan priest in Ciudad Real and partner D. Javier Quevedo, has written a letter to Mr Zapatero giving the answer to the question. This is the text of the letter: Mr. Rodriguez
Zapatero.Soy Rico Juan Carlos Gomez-Martin-Gil, a diocesan priest in Ciudad Real, mate Javier Quevedo, a little younger than him, 36 years. I have the pleasure to answer the question you avoided answering my colleague. Might surround the answer because you doubt the issue or because detrimental to its image calculated to answer no, as I fear that is what really piensa.Dudo you can read this letter, rather it will have much to do and letters that answer, but I hope to read it in Moncloa and all those who think like you, including members of the Popular Party have agreed to the current abortion law passed by Felipe Gonzalez. Excuse to send this letter to my contacts, friends and acquaintances, at least, the form "letter to the president" will serve as appealing genre. Another excuse to write down conoce.Así data as well, I have an answer for you Is the embryo a human being?
A. - Yes, and not an argument from the faith we profess, they say the empirical sciences, biology, in that there is unanimity. By 4 scientific facts found: 1.-When
merge male gametes (sperm, 23 chromosomes) and female (egg, 23 chromosomes) before 20 hours of intercourse, there is a new organism, the zygote, with 46 chromosomes. The zygote is the first stage of the embryo is a cell of 46 chromosomes in their genetic makeup than the father and mother. All have 46 chromosomes except the gametes players that funny .... 2.-That
cell is a body of humans, they say their chromosomes, their DNA, it is not dog or cat, then what is?
3.-The zygote is a body set, the first of a chain of biological events. It's new, original, unique and unrepeatable, it is contained all the assets genetic eye color, height ....
4.-This organism grows and develops in a coordinated, continuous, gradual, following a distinguished preventing cell multiplication stages qualitatively, but quantitatively change.
B. - These scientific evidence demonstrates four other characteristics of the human embryo:
1.-biological unit of the new being.
2.-Coordination: All elements of the embryo develop in perfect coordination as part of a whole, only one, oneness. 3.-Continuum
development: quantitative and differential development of the embryo is a perfect continuous, no leaps, no mutations substantial. We are always faced with the same subject, just change the size or time, quantities, not qualities. 4.-Gradual
: The final shape is achieved gradually. Not even reached after childbirth. The process continues as we live ... is a lie that has been pre-embryos and embryos. What day, minute and second stops being a thing to be the other? Given these irrefutable physical data, it is clear that deny human status to the embryo is to contradict the physical sciences, not only religion or philosophy metaphysics. And all preconceived ideas, ideological prejudices. To have a concept of man cut, even by scientists, but for subjectivism ético y positivismo jurídico: “la única fuente de verdad o moralidad son las opiniones y decisiones humanas”. Lo legal es lo moral. Recordemos los desastres de Hitler elegido legalmente por una democracia legítima…La raíz del problema es el Relativismo: la verdad, si existe, depende del color del cristal de quien mire... Ya decía Benedicto XVI, es el mal radical postmoderno: la dictadura del relativismo. Es el suicidio de la Verdad y del Hombre.Así pues, verificado por la ciencia biológica que el embrión es un ser humano, que comienza a existir en el momento de la fecundación, las demás ciencias no sólo no pueden contradecir ese dato sino que deben complementarlo, protegerlo, razonarlo, explain .... is the task of philosophical science, legal science, science ethics, theological science. That is also science! Increasing perspective, allow me to express the religious point of view of Jewish believers, Christians (including Obama Bible) and Muslims, that is, 3,000 million people. Half the world's people believe and we reasoned that the separate body and soul (anima in Latin, as you know). We affirm that the body comes from parents and the Anima of God, joining in the moment of conception. You were right when, knowing that there was a priest in the audience, said, "This is encouraging," it seemed that he sensed the question. Without intending it, etymologically, you are assuming the existence of the soul, saying, this is put soul. The embryo is encouraged because it has soul, soul. This lies at the western concept of Person. Is it because of this that you replace this term by machaconamente Citizen?
C. - it is assumed that the human embryo should enjoy all human rights and with all the conditions that the Letter of the UN Human Rights. The first is the inviolable right to life of every human person, independent of any human decision from conception hastasu natural death. This questions the following:
1 .- Why not have the same rights as an embryo with Down syndrome, Izaskum, the girl with the same syndrome so graciously served in the same program? Does he know that Down is considered one of malformations protected by law legalizing abortion for maternal decision to kill the fetus? Did you know that has tremendously decreased the number of births Down from the proliferation of prenatal diagnosis, amniocentesis?
2 .- Chemical weapons are banned even in cases of war, (for some it is bundled with the arms milloncillos "toy" which has sold to Israel) Why allow chemical weapons, inhuman to exterminate the human embryo? Not exaggerating, just watch videos of abortions. Any technique for killing the fetus is not used in the wars over "illegal"
3 .- The question goes beyond the issue of abortion is it ethical to produce, on request, human embryos, violating his crib, separating the procreative sex? What rights do the embryos lie in the freezer? Is it ethical handling and destruction as a means to another end, however good it is? Is it ethical to everything that is technically possible and politically correct? According to their laws and some of the PP itself, according to the laws of science, we must conclude that no.
D. - R. Zapatero, you talk about a mother's right to abortar.Eso is proposed in its election manifesto. But, as you well know, for now, and it is tragic, legalized abortion is a crime that has no legal consequences, legal, or contributors to the mother, in three cases it decriminalized Article 417 of the Penal Code (BOE 12 -7 to 1985):
1.-Rape, legal complaints, if done in the first 12 weeks of gestation. 2.-Malformations
serious physical or mental fetus (Down syndrome among them): if done in the first 22 weeks. 3.-Case
grave danger the life and health, physical or mental state of mother .¡¡¡¡ No time limit!! Results of this Act: "The vast majority
is hosting the 3 rd of course, very few at 2, rarely to 1.
"In Spain, 110,000 abortions in the last year, though, so much fallacy of safe sex ... Adding all abortions in the world since there is such a" breakthrough ", are more than all the wars of S. XX. Sobering.
"It's funny that in Poland, there the same cases, are no more than 5,000 abortions. Perhaps the reason is that in Spain, the medical report does justify abortion another doctor working in the same abortion clinic and that English law only prohibits that is the same and not under the command of that aborta.En Poland must be a state doctor who values \u200b\u200bthe course pro-abortion.
"These abortions have no legal consequences for the mother. But paradoxically, which aims to prevent physical or psychological harm to the mother, abortion, causing at least one post-abortion depression, the abortionist is not advised (sometimes chronic depression) that few dare to tell and report later. In my ministry I know cases, is a real drama, a mother guilt horrors costs forgive herself, even if repentant and forgiven by God knows.
-Christians, and people with sense common silent to the grave danger assumption of the Mother of Life (not just health). Two lives are at stake, it is moral death of the fetus, indirectly, to live a mother, always the death of the fetus is not caused direct action to save the mother. Abortion may be the result of applying a life-saving treatment and fatal for the mother and child. Yet many mothers prefer to die to save his son! R. Zapatero, you go to very specific theme, direct, wise, kind and sympathetic makes my dear friend Javier Quevedo. Prefers to speak of avoiding prison for women who abort Are not there already more than enough facilities for abortions without going to jail? There are alternatives to prison, as there are abortion, why do not exhaust all of them? But, certainly, if you steal from hunger (attenuating) can lead to jail ... Mr. R. Zapatero, abortion as a right of the mother, is very serious, is a quantum leap in the Act
"If Mother is right, abortion will be administered in hospitals, which are free. The mother commits a crime free, something that neither dentists ...
"If Mother is right, I'm afraid it will conflict with the right to conscientious objection of the physician of the State, losing the favor of that. We have seen in the case of judges with the adoption issue by homosexuals and we're seeing with the Education for Citizenship ...
E. - But, Mr. R. Zapatero, his party wants more commitment to the law of deadlines, a deadline to abort without any further requirement. It is abortion, no matter what date so happens the moment of fertilization which is maximum at 20 hours of intercourse, when you kiss the sperm and the egg and the zygote is formed, the first stage of the embryo. So-called morning-after pill is abortion in most cases, it also prevents implantation in the uterus of the fertilized egg, embrión.Quizás, R. Zapatero, pretend you imitate his model of "Messiah" Huseim Barak Obama (even to swear to the Bible and will save us from the crisis, hunger, war ... and pray for him to do what is in your hand) already removed restrictions on partial birth abortion, that is, that can be aborted at the same time of delivery by clicking on the child's brain is born partially out and legally dead. With D. Paco Vazquez out of play, I wonder, is not nobody in his party who speak up against this issue, as clearly they do, both obey him or think so little? That said D. José Bono CP
F. - My partner, Javier Quevedo, the question assessing contextualized sudefensa human rights and condemnation of the war. I'll never understand why people who defend human rights as those already born, even animal rights (some pacifists, environmentalists ...) do not defend human life equally weak, the unborn. It is demagogic to accuse the Church of the opposite, as some suggest. I hope you do not. Know that the Church is the institution that better, personally disinterested and defending the life of everyone: the unborn as well, the dying, the unemployed, the sick, the hungry, the persecuted, the elderly, the immigrant ... to the sinner. Whoever denies this denies the evidence. The three hours I write cost This letter does not deplete my interest in preparing well in the upcoming parish Campaign Against Hunger Manos Unidas. Help me not to spend more time in these letters and these issues, and I'll write another about their promise of 0.7%, the Millennium Development Goals, debt cancellation for impoverished countries, development aid ... True Christians have to follow Jesus' command: "preferential option for the poor, the poverty problem is to identify solely with monetary or material shortages, the result of a materialistic interpretation of human beings. The current crisis is not only economic, of substance, moral crisis, anthropological. So says the pope, also his colleague Obama. Therefore, the solution of the crisis is not only in the economy. As the gap material, a type of poverty, well you know, it's not the only pobreza.Puede be culturally deprived, emotional, physical, health. May even lack the basic rights of equality, freedom, education, family ..., having all the material needs met. The right to life is a basic right of the person, of any person, is as important as the right to life of the starving than of dying from abortion. It is true that today, in the world, there are more people dying of hunger that abortion (in Spain do not), differences the number of victims will be looking to evaluate the solutions, but not the importance of human life. Moreover, he that is born has a chance to defend himself, to seek and receive help, who does not yet born, is the most defenseless, the most needy, the most dependent on others, the poorest, so that more must defend the state and a party that says efender the poor as you preside.En end, Mr. Rodriguez Zapatero, Spain thank you for your work. I appreciate your interest in answering questions from citizens, but I do not respond to questions such as my dear friend when "this is encouraged" by their very palabras.Sepa that I pray for you, and all rulers, is my particular devotion and duty of Christians pray for their health, work, his wife and daughters to be happy doing demás.Atentamente happy. Juan Carlos Gomez-Martin-Gil.Sacerdote Rico (also proud of it) from Ciudad Real, Spain, non-denominational and non-secular state.
0 comments:
Post a Comment